2006 Audi TT vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (225 HP) has 172 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 815 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Audi | MCC |
Model | TT | Smart |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1460 mm |