2006 BMW 530 vs. 1960 DKW Munga
To start off, 2006 BMW 530 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW 530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 530 (255 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW 530. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 530 | 1960 DKW Munga | |
Make | BMW | DKW |
Model | 530 | Munga |
Year Released | 2006 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2999 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 7.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 31 L |