2006 BMW 645 vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 BMW 645 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 BMW 645 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW 645 weights approximately 1026 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2006 BMW 645 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 645. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 645 | 1980 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | BMW | Mitsubishi |
Model | 645 | Colt |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1836 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2310 mm |