2006 BMW M3 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2006 BMW M3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 3,245 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M3 (333 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW M3 weights approximately 225 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2006 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW M3 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M3 | CU-X |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3245 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 333 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |