2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1986 Hyundai Pony
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Hyundai Pony. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Hyundai Pony would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 337 more horse power than 1986 Hyundai Pony. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1986 Hyundai Pony.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Hyundai Pony, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1986 Hyundai Pony | |
| Make | Cadillac | Hyundai |
| Model | CTS | Pony |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1296 cc |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2390 mm |
