2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2002 Ford Tonka
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Tonka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Tonka would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (536 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 2002 Ford Tonka | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | CTS | Tonka |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 6000 cc |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 536 Nm | 814 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 6150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2370 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 4200 mm |
