2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2013 Chevrolet Sonic
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Sonic is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 2013 Chevrolet Sonic. (134 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2013 Chevrolet Sonic.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Sonic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Sonic. (201 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Sonic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 2013 Chevrolet Sonic | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | CTS | Sonic |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1800 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1506 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.6 L/100km | 5.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 46 L |