2006 Cadillac DTS vs. 1968 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2006 Cadillac DTS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac DTS (275 HP) has 222 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 1300.
Because 1968 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac DTS (396 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac DTS | 1968 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | DTS | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 4572 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 396 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2430 mm |
