2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1962 Lancia Flavia
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1517 kg more than 1962 Lancia Flavia.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Lancia Flavia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac Escalade | 1962 Lancia Flavia | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
| Model | Escalade | Flavia |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 101 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2667 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 42 L |
