2006 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus Extreme. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus Extreme would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (120 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus Extreme. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 2184 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lotus Extreme. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (180 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac Escalade | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | Escalade | Extreme |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 700 cc |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2640 kg | 456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2420 mm |