2006 Cadillac SRX vs. 2012 Volvo C70
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac SRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac SRX would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 211 kg more than 2012 Volvo C70.
Because 2006 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac SRX (427 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo C70. (350 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac SRX | 2012 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | SRX | C70 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 427 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1951 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 60 L |