2006 Cadillac STS vs. 2002 Jaguar X400
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar X400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac STS. (253 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac STS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar X400 weights approximately 18 kg more than 2006 Cadillac STS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac STS. (342 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac STS | 2002 Jaguar X400 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | STS | X400 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3563 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 342 Nm | 525 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1782 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 69 L |
