2006 Cadillac XLR vs. 1951 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2006 Cadillac XLR is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac XLR (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1951 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1951 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 6 kg more than 1951 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac XLR | 1951 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Cadillac | Talbot |
| Model | XLR | Baby |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 4572 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3130 mm |
