2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Impala | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3884 cc | 5736 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2960 mm |