2006 Chevrolet Kalos vs. 1980 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,342 cc (12 cylinders), 1980 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Kalos weights approximately 170 kg more than 1980 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1980 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Kalos | 1980 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Kalos | XJR |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1399 cc | 5342 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 90 L |