2006 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1963 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP) has 348 more horse power than 1963 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1963 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 98 kg more than 1963 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 449 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: