2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (374 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | TrailBlazer | HRT |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4157 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 269 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 374 Nm | 815 Nm |
| Top Speed | 192 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
