2006 Chrysler 300 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Chrysler 300 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler 300 (247 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 703 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler 300 (340 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler 300 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
Model | 300 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1873 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 64 L |