2006 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Voyager (172 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 640 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Voyager (278 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler Voyager | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Voyager | CU-X |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3300 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 278 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1985 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 80 L |
