2006 Dodge Dakota vs. 1962 Holden EK
To start off, 2006 Dodge Dakota is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Dakota (210 HP) has 146 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Dakota | 1962 Holden EK | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Dakota | EK |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3703 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 164 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
