2006 Fiat Croma vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 241 kg more than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Fiat | Mitsubishi |
Model | Croma | Challenger |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1836 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2730 mm |