2006 Fiat Stilo vs. 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 690 kg more than 2006 Fiat Stilo.
Because 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Stilo | 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Fiat | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Stilo | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1746 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 2150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 107 L |
