2006 Fiat Stilo vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover Range Rover (190 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Stilo. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Stilo.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Fiat Stilo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover Range Rover (306 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Stilo. (221 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1994 Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Stilo | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Fiat | Rover |
Model | Stilo | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2446 cc | 3947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 306 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 94.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 71.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1900 mm |