2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2003 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2003 Mazda MPV. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda MPV.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda MPV. (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2003 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-150 | MPV |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Van | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 75 L |