2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 66 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Ford | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Ranger | 6C |
Year Released | 2006 | 1940 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 77 L |