2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1969 Renault 12
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Renault 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Renault 12 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1969 Renault 12. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1969 Renault 12.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Renault 12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Renault 12. (96 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Renault 12.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1969 Renault 12 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Ranger | 12 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 324 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 60 L |
