2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1974 Seat 131
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Seat 131 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1974 Seat 131. (64 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1974 Seat 131.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Seat 131. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Seat 131. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Seat 131.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1974 Seat 131 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Ranger | 131 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2500 mm |