2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2005 Ford E-150
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1163 kg more than 2006 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (136 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 2005 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Ranger | E-150 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1789 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 2383 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 132 L |
