2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-280 would be higher. At 2,801 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-280 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu I-280 weights approximately 750 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Isuzu I-280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | I-280 | 3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2801 cc | 1560 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 55 L |