2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2010 BMW 325
To start off, 2010 BMW 325 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-280 would be higher. At 2,801 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 325 (215 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW 325 (315 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2010 BMW 325 | |
Make | Isuzu | BMW |
Model | I-280 | 325 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2801 cc | 2494 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |