2006 Isuzu I-280 vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-280 would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-280 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-280 (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-280 | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Isuzu | Mitsubishi |
Model | I-280 | Colt |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1332 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 47 L |