2006 Jaguar X-Type vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2006 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar X-Type (154 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 290 kg more than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jaguar X-Type (366 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm). This means 2006 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Jaguar X-Type | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | X-Type | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 143 HP |
Torque | 366 Nm | 192 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |