2006 Jeep Commander vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2006 Jeep Commander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Commander (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 304 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1855 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Commander (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 468 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Jeep Commander | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | Commander | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 5653 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2060 mm |
