2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2011 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2011 Renault Fluence is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Renault Fluence is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Fluence (140 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 35 kg more than 2011 Renault Fluence.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Renault Fluence has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Renault Fluence will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 2011 Renault Fluence | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 3 | Fluence |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 140 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4618 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1809 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2702 mm |