2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk has manual transmission. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Studebaker |
Model | CLS | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2006 | 1956 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 507 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |