2006 Nissan 350Z vs. 2009 Hyundai i20
To start off, 2009 Hyundai i20 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan 350Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan 350Z would be higher. At 3,491 cc, 2006 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan 350Z (300 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 2009 Hyundai i20. (99 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 2009 Hyundai i20.
Because 2006 Nissan 350Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Nissan 350Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Hyundai i20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan 350Z (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Hyundai i20. (220 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Hyundai i20.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Nissan 350Z | 2009 Hyundai i20 | |
Make | Nissan | Hyundai |
Model | 350Z | i20 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1396 cc |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 3.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 5.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |