2006 Nissan M vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan M would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan M is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan M (462 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford C-Max. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford C-Max. 2006 Nissan M has automatic transmission and 2010 Ford C-Max has manual transmission. 2010 Ford C-Max will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Nissan M will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Nissan M | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | M | C-Max |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4500 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
| Torque | 462 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1828 mm |
