2006 Proton Gen-2 vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Proton Gen-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Proton Gen-2 would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Proton Gen-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2006 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 2006 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Proton Gen-2 | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Proton | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Gen-2 | Colt |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2500 mm |
