2006 Smart ForFour vs. 2003 Spyker C8
To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 3,999 cc, 2003 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Spyker C8 weights approximately 380 kg more than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Because 2003 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Smart ForFour | 2003 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Smart | Spyker |
| Model | ForFour | C8 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1332 cc | 3999 cc |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 100 L |
