2007 Cadillac BLS vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2007 Cadillac BLS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2007 Cadillac BLS. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2007 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 455 kg more than 2007 Cadillac BLS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac BLS | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | BLS | 62 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1908 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 79 L |
