2007 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2013 Honda Odyssey
To start off, 2013 Honda Odyssey is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Honda Odyssey is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda Odyssey (245 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2007 Chrysler Sebring. (174 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda Odyssey should accelerate faster than 2007 Chrysler Sebring.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Honda Odyssey (339 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Chrysler Sebring. (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Honda Odyssey will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Chrysler Sebring | 2013 Honda Odyssey | |
| Make | Chrysler | Honda |
| Model | Sebring | Odyssey |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 3471 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 225 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5152 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2011 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1737 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3000 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.4 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 11.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 80 L |
