2007 Ford Ecosport vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 170 more horse power than 2007 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Ford Ecosport | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Ecosport | XF |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1400 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 237 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4228 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1679 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2909 mm |
