2007 Honda CR-V vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2007 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2007 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2012 Nissan Pixo has manual transmission. 2012 Nissan Pixo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Honda CR-V | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Honda | Nissan |
Model | CR-V | Pixo |
Year Released | 2007 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.5 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2360 mm |