2007 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 2007 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (143 HP @ 6750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200.
Because 2007 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Rover 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Wrangler (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (174 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Jeep Wrangler | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | Wrangler | 200 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3778 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6750 RPM |
Torque | 321 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2510 mm |