2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1954 Rover P4
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Rover P4 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1954 Rover P4. (74 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1954 Rover P4.
Because 1954 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Rover P4. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1954 Rover P4 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | CX-9 | P4 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 2103 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 52 L |