2007 Renault Clio vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (111 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (151 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio. 2007 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden Epica has manual transmission. 2009 Holden Epica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Renault Clio | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Renault | Holden |
Model | Clio | Epica |
Year Released | 2007 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 151 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |