2007 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,956 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Toyota 4Runner (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2012 Suzuki Equator. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2012 Suzuki Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 210 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Toyota 4Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Toyota 4Runner (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Suzuki Equator. (171 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Suzuki Equator.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Toyota 4Runner 2012 Suzuki Equator
Make Toyota Suzuki
Model 4Runner Equator
Year Released 2007 2012
Body Type SUV Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3956 cc 2501 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 236 HP 150 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 361 Nm 171 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1185 kg 975 kg
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 5250 mm
Vehicle Width 1920 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1810 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 3200 mm
Fuel Consumption 10.7 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.1 L/100km 15.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.8 L/100km 7.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 87 L 80 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]