2008 Audi TT vs. 1972 Mitsubishi Jeep
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mitsubishi Jeep. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mitsubishi Jeep would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mitsubishi Jeep. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mitsubishi Jeep. 2008 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 1972 Mitsubishi Jeep has manual transmission. 1972 Mitsubishi Jeep will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 1972 Mitsubishi Jeep | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | TT | Jeep |
Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2650 mm |