2008 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Captiva. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Captiva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 440 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Captiva (320 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (215 Nm). This means 2008 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Captiva | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Captiva | Outlander |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 215 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 59 L |