2008 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 250 kg more than 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Lumina | 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Chevrolet | Studebaker |
Model | Lumina | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2980 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 68 L |